What does it mean that "astrology is real"?

I specifically am referring to a specific mode of astrology called Archetypal Astrology developed primarily by Richard Tarnas with support from Stanislav Grof and countless others.

What differentiates Archetypal Astrology from other forms is its precision with forecasting psychological trends, its minimal focus solely on the angular relationship between planets (disregarded houses and signs), as well as its emergence from the Depth Psychology research lineage.

Astrology is real It doesn’t matter whether you believe this is true, or whether you believe it to be pseudoscience. There is a verifiable correlation between planetary alignments and world events in the historical record. A lot of the early experiments in attempting to seek an empirical basis for astrology were wrapped up in the trappings of the Newtonian-Cartesian paradigm. They required a simplistic, concrete and immediate correlation between astrological claims and statistical data.